Major streaming platforms are actively working to remove Global Music Rights (GMR) from the upcoming Phonorecords V rate-setting proceedings, a move that could significantly alter royalty negotiations for songwriters and publishers in the US mechanical rights landscape. This exclusion effort directly impacts the financial future of Black music creators and urban radio stakeholders who rely on transparent mechanical rate structures to fund artist compensation and publishing operations.
Platforms Claim GMR Lacks Mechanical Rights Interest
Legal documents filed with the Copyright Royalty Board reveal that Spotify, Apple Music, Amazon Music, Pandora, and YouTube Music owner Google expressly moved to extricate GMR from the process. The streaming coalition argues that GMR oversees performance rights rather than mechanical rights, stating the organization lacks the “significant interest” required to participate in proceedings that set rates for Section 115 mechanical rights under the Copyright Act. This legal maneuvering creates a complex barrier for GMR, which has aggressively pursued higher royalty rates for its songwriter clients in recent battles with radio stations and the Radio Music Licensing Committee.
Azoffs Negotiating Power May Be the Real Target
Industry sources suggest the stated legal reasoning masks a deeper strategic objective: removing Irving Azoff from the negotiation table entirely. Azoff is widely recognized as a fierce negotiator who consistently secures substantial royalty rate increases for artists and publishers. His absence from the Phonorecords V proceedings would likely weaken the bargaining position of songwriters facing streaming platforms that have historically proposed the lowest royalty rates in history. While Azoff remains a leader within the Music Artists Coalition, insiders question whether he is actively engaging in this specific battle or allowing GMR to withdraw quietly.
The exclusion of GMR coincides with broader tensions over mechanical royalty settlements. Major publishers and streaming services recently reached a proposed settlement for non-streaming formats covering 2028 through 2032, which independent advocates and creators like the Songwriters Guild of America and Eminem’s publisher Eight Mile Style have strongly opposed. These critics demand a material composition rate of 15.65 cents per track rather than the modest inflation-adjusted growth proposed by the industry coalition. The Copyright Royalty Board will post this proposal for public comment and objections within days, setting the stage for further legal disputes over songwriter compensation.
For editorial consideration and industry coverage inquiries, contact Radio Facts.
