As of now, the legal battle between Moxey’s publishing company and the major label continues. The outcome remains uncertain, with both parties steadfast in their positions regarding trademark rights and copyright claims.​
#MusicIndustry #CopyrightInfringement #TrademarkDispute #MusicPublishing #LegalBattle
For more stories, visit Radio Facts.
See more in Music Publishing.
Undeterred, Moxey’s company filed an amended complaint in March 2025. They refuted claims of retaliation, emphasizing their commitment to protecting their songwriters’ rights. The amended filing detailed over 100 compositions allegedly infringed upon by the major label, supported by extensive evidence of the label’s unauthorized use of these works. ​
Ongoing Legal Proceedings
As of now, the legal battle between Moxey’s publishing company and the major label continues. The outcome remains uncertain, with both parties steadfast in their positions regarding trademark rights and copyright claims.​
#MusicIndustry #CopyrightInfringement #TrademarkDispute #MusicPublishing #LegalBattle
For more stories, visit Radio Facts.
See more in Music Publishing.
In February 2025, the major label sought to dismiss the copyright lawsuit, labeling it a retaliatory move in light of the ongoing trademark dispute. They argued that the audit in question had been settled years prior and that the lawsuit lacked specific claims of infringement. ​
Amended Complaint: Strengthening the Case
Undeterred, Moxey’s company filed an amended complaint in March 2025. They refuted claims of retaliation, emphasizing their commitment to protecting their songwriters’ rights. The amended filing detailed over 100 compositions allegedly infringed upon by the major label, supported by extensive evidence of the label’s unauthorized use of these works. ​
Ongoing Legal Proceedings
As of now, the legal battle between Moxey’s publishing company and the major label continues. The outcome remains uncertain, with both parties steadfast in their positions regarding trademark rights and copyright claims.​
#MusicIndustry #CopyrightInfringement #TrademarkDispute #MusicPublishing #LegalBattle
For more stories, visit Radio Facts.
See more in Music Publishing.
In November 2024, Moxey’s publishing company filed a lawsuit against the major label and its subsidiaries, alleging copyright infringement. The suit claimed that the label used compositions owned by Moxey’s company without proper licensing, resulting in underpayment and non-payment of royalties. An audit reportedly uncovered these discrepancies, but the major label allegedly refused to rectify the payments.
Major Label’s Response: Motion to Dismiss
In February 2025, the major label sought to dismiss the copyright lawsuit, labeling it a retaliatory move in light of the ongoing trademark dispute. They argued that the audit in question had been settled years prior and that the lawsuit lacked specific claims of infringement. ​
Amended Complaint: Strengthening the Case
Undeterred, Moxey’s company filed an amended complaint in March 2025. They refuted claims of retaliation, emphasizing their commitment to protecting their songwriters’ rights. The amended filing detailed over 100 compositions allegedly infringed upon by the major label, supported by extensive evidence of the label’s unauthorized use of these works. ​
Ongoing Legal Proceedings
As of now, the legal battle between Moxey’s publishing company and the major label continues. The outcome remains uncertain, with both parties steadfast in their positions regarding trademark rights and copyright claims.​
#MusicIndustry #CopyrightInfringement #TrademarkDispute #MusicPublishing #LegalBattle
For more stories, visit Radio Facts.
See more in Music Publishing.
Post-acquisition, tensions escalated over the use of the ‘Ultra’ name. The major label’s subsidiary sued Moxey’s publishing company in December 2022, alleging unauthorized use of the ‘Ultra’ trademark. By December 2024, a jury determined that Moxey’s company had breached the trademark. Consequently, in February 2025, a U.S. federal court mandated that Moxey’s company cease using the ‘Ultra’ name within 180 days, though they could reference themselves as “formerly known as Ultra International Music Publishing” on social media for 18 months. ​
Copyright Allegations: Claims of Unlicensed Use
In November 2024, Moxey’s publishing company filed a lawsuit against the major label and its subsidiaries, alleging copyright infringement. The suit claimed that the label used compositions owned by Moxey’s company without proper licensing, resulting in underpayment and non-payment of royalties. An audit reportedly uncovered these discrepancies, but the major label allegedly refused to rectify the payments.
Major Label’s Response: Motion to Dismiss
In February 2025, the major label sought to dismiss the copyright lawsuit, labeling it a retaliatory move in light of the ongoing trademark dispute. They argued that the audit in question had been settled years prior and that the lawsuit lacked specific claims of infringement. ​
Amended Complaint: Strengthening the Case
Undeterred, Moxey’s company filed an amended complaint in March 2025. They refuted claims of retaliation, emphasizing their commitment to protecting their songwriters’ rights. The amended filing detailed over 100 compositions allegedly infringed upon by the major label, supported by extensive evidence of the label’s unauthorized use of these works. ​
Ongoing Legal Proceedings
As of now, the legal battle between Moxey’s publishing company and the major label continues. The outcome remains uncertain, with both parties steadfast in their positions regarding trademark rights and copyright claims.​
#MusicIndustry #CopyrightInfringement #TrademarkDispute #MusicPublishing #LegalBattle
For more stories, visit Radio Facts.
See more in Music Publishing.
In 2012, Patrick Moxey sold a 50% stake in his record label to a major record label, continuing to run it as President and co-owner. By 2021, the major label acquired the remaining stake, leading to Moxey’s departure in January 2022. Throughout this period, Moxey retained full ownership of his independent music publishing company.​
Trademark Dispute: The ‘Ultra’ Name Conflict
Post-acquisition, tensions escalated over the use of the ‘Ultra’ name. The major label’s subsidiary sued Moxey’s publishing company in December 2022, alleging unauthorized use of the ‘Ultra’ trademark. By December 2024, a jury determined that Moxey’s company had breached the trademark. Consequently, in February 2025, a U.S. federal court mandated that Moxey’s company cease using the ‘Ultra’ name within 180 days, though they could reference themselves as “formerly known as Ultra International Music Publishing” on social media for 18 months. ​
Copyright Allegations: Claims of Unlicensed Use
In November 2024, Moxey’s publishing company filed a lawsuit against the major label and its subsidiaries, alleging copyright infringement. The suit claimed that the label used compositions owned by Moxey’s company without proper licensing, resulting in underpayment and non-payment of royalties. An audit reportedly uncovered these discrepancies, but the major label allegedly refused to rectify the payments.
Major Label’s Response: Motion to Dismiss
In February 2025, the major label sought to dismiss the copyright lawsuit, labeling it a retaliatory move in light of the ongoing trademark dispute. They argued that the audit in question had been settled years prior and that the lawsuit lacked specific claims of infringement. ​
Amended Complaint: Strengthening the Case
Undeterred, Moxey’s company filed an amended complaint in March 2025. They refuted claims of retaliation, emphasizing their commitment to protecting their songwriters’ rights. The amended filing detailed over 100 compositions allegedly infringed upon by the major label, supported by extensive evidence of the label’s unauthorized use of these works. ​
Ongoing Legal Proceedings
As of now, the legal battle between Moxey’s publishing company and the major label continues. The outcome remains uncertain, with both parties steadfast in their positions regarding trademark rights and copyright claims.​
#MusicIndustry #CopyrightInfringement #TrademarkDispute #MusicPublishing #LegalBattle
For more stories, visit Radio Facts.
See more in Music Publishing.
Background: A Complex History
In 2012, Patrick Moxey sold a 50% stake in his record label to a major record label, continuing to run it as President and co-owner. By 2021, the major label acquired the remaining stake, leading to Moxey’s departure in January 2022. Throughout this period, Moxey retained full ownership of his independent music publishing company.​
Trademark Dispute: The ‘Ultra’ Name Conflict
Post-acquisition, tensions escalated over the use of the ‘Ultra’ name. The major label’s subsidiary sued Moxey’s publishing company in December 2022, alleging unauthorized use of the ‘Ultra’ trademark. By December 2024, a jury determined that Moxey’s company had breached the trademark. Consequently, in February 2025, a U.S. federal court mandated that Moxey’s company cease using the ‘Ultra’ name within 180 days, though they could reference themselves as “formerly known as Ultra International Music Publishing” on social media for 18 months. ​
Copyright Allegations: Claims of Unlicensed Use
In November 2024, Moxey’s publishing company filed a lawsuit against the major label and its subsidiaries, alleging copyright infringement. The suit claimed that the label used compositions owned by Moxey’s company without proper licensing, resulting in underpayment and non-payment of royalties. An audit reportedly uncovered these discrepancies, but the major label allegedly refused to rectify the payments.
Major Label’s Response: Motion to Dismiss
In February 2025, the major label sought to dismiss the copyright lawsuit, labeling it a retaliatory move in light of the ongoing trademark dispute. They argued that the audit in question had been settled years prior and that the lawsuit lacked specific claims of infringement. ​
Amended Complaint: Strengthening the Case
Undeterred, Moxey’s company filed an amended complaint in March 2025. They refuted claims of retaliation, emphasizing their commitment to protecting their songwriters’ rights. The amended filing detailed over 100 compositions allegedly infringed upon by the major label, supported by extensive evidence of the label’s unauthorized use of these works. ​
Ongoing Legal Proceedings
As of now, the legal battle between Moxey’s publishing company and the major label continues. The outcome remains uncertain, with both parties steadfast in their positions regarding trademark rights and copyright claims.​
#MusicIndustry #CopyrightInfringement #TrademarkDispute #MusicPublishing #LegalBattle
For more stories, visit Radio Facts.
See more in Music Publishing.