Navigating the Best and Worst Cities for Singles

0
17

Navigating the Best and Worst Cities for SinglesWalletHub today released its report on 2018’s Best & Worst Cities for Singles

Some singles are closer to a happily ever after than they think, but it depends on where they live. To determine where singles have the highest chance of finding love, WalletHub compared more than 180 U.S. cities across 34 key indicators of dating-friendliness. The data set ranges from share of single population to number of online dating opportunities to nightlife options per capita.

Click (next) for the next best city for singles

10. Portland, ME

Navigating the Best and Worst Cities for Singles

09. Minneapolis, MN

Navigating the Best and Worst Cities for Singles

08. San Diego, CA

 

Navigating the Best and Worst Cities for Singles

07. Chicago, IL

 

Navigating the Best and Worst Cities for Singles

06. Seattle, WA

Navigating the Best and Worst Cities for Singles

05. Los Angeles

 

Navigating the Best and Worst Cities for Singles

04. Portland, OR

 

Navigating the Best and Worst Cities for Singles

03. San Francisco, CA

 

Navigating the Best and Worst Cities for Singles

02. Denver, CO

 

Navigating the Best and Worst Cities for Singles

01. Atlanta, GA

Navigating the Best and Worst Cities for Singles

Best Cities for Singles Worst Cities for Singles
1 Atlanta, GA 173 Laredo, TX
2 Denver, CO 174 Yonkers, NY
3 San Francisco, CA 175 Lewiston, ME
4 Portland, OR 176 Glendale, CA
5 Los Angeles, CA 177 Warwick, RI
6 Seattle, WA 178 South Burlington, VT
7 Chicago, IL 179 Pearl City, HI
8 San Diego, CA 180 Hialeah, FL
9 Minneapolis, MN 181 Pembroke Pines, FL
10 Portland, ME 182 Brownsville, TX

source

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here