Marvell Scott, a former WABC sportscaster and sports medicine physician, was indicted by a Manhattan grand jury on charges related to the alleged rape of a 14-year-old girl in 2008. The charges, announced by Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr., include second-degree rape, patronizing a prostitute, and child endangerment. Scott, 36, pleaded not guilty and denies all accusations.
Allegations and Incident Details
According to prosecutors, Scott met with a man on Manhattan’s West Side on June 5, 2008, and paid him to bring two teenage girls, aged 14 and 16, to his apartment on West 47th Street. Court documents allege that Scott engaged in sexual intercourse with the 14-year-old girl while the older teenager was also in the room. The 14-year-old, identified as a runaway, was reportedly under the control of a pimp who exploited her for financial gain.
Scott’s Defense and Response
Scott’s attorney, Richard Portale, has categorically denied the allegations, stating that Scott is the victim of a setup. Portale claimed the girls approached Scott and requested to use his bathroom, which he allowed out of courtesy. He argued that the incident was a calculated attempt to extort Scott, describing him as a “mark” targeted by the alleged pimp and the two teenagers. Portale emphasized Scott’s cooperation with authorities and his intent to clear his name.
Professional Background and Impact
Marvell Scott was a prominent sportscaster at WABC until his sudden departure in 2009, which he initially described as a vacation. He later announced his decision to leave broadcasting and concentrate on his medical practice, specializing in sports medicine. The allegations have significantly tarnished his professional reputation and raised questions about his career trajectory.
Legal Consequences
If convicted, Scott faces severe legal penalties. The second-degree rape charge, a class-D felony, is punishable by a prison sentence of 2-1/3 to 7 years. The misdemeanor charges of patronizing a prostitute and child endangerment carry additional penalties of up to one year in jail each.
Case Developments and Broader Implications
The case remains under investigation, with prosecutors seeking to establish the facts and motives behind the incident. The defense plans to challenge the credibility of the accusers and argue that Scott was unfairly targeted. The trial will highlight issues surrounding the exploitation of minors and the legal responsibilities of individuals in such scenarios. As the legal process unfolds, the outcome will likely hinge on the presentation.
