2018’s Best & Worst Cities for Singles

Most Read Today

radiofacts.comWalletHub today released its report on 2018’s Best & Worst Cities for Singles

Some singles are closer to a happily ever after than they think, but it depends on where they live. To determine where singles have the highest chance of finding love, WalletHub compared more than 180 U.S. cities across 34 key indicators of dating-friendliness. The data set ranges from share of single population to number of online dating opportunities to nightlife options per capita. Click (next) for the next best city for singles

10. Portland, ME

radiofacts.com

09. Minneapolis, MN

radiofacts.com

08. San Diego, CA

 

radiofacts.com

07. Chicago, IL

 

radiofacts.com

06. Seattle, WA

radiofacts.com

05. Los Angeles

 

radiofacts.com

04. Portland, OR

 

radiofacts.com

03. San Francisco, CA

 

radiofacts.com

02. Denver, CO

 

radiofacts.com

01. Atlanta, GA

radiofacts.com

Best Cities for Singles Worst Cities for Singles
1 Atlanta, GA 173 Laredo, TX
2 Denver, CO 174 Yonkers, NY
3 San Francisco, CA 175 Lewiston, ME
4 Portland, OR 176 Glendale, CA
5 Los Angeles, CA 177 Warwick, RI
6 Seattle, WA 178 South Burlington, VT
7 Chicago, IL 179 Pearl City, HI
8 San Diego, CA 180 Hialeah, FL
9 Minneapolis, MN 181 Pembroke Pines, FL
10 Portland, ME 182 Brownsville, TX

source

SUBSCRIBE

paste

Top 10s

Leave a Reply

You May Also Like

Latest article